Skip to content

Conversation

@vikaschoudhary16
Copy link
Contributor

Existing logic does fails to reset the pointer to nil. Fixed this by declaring pointer variable at appropriate location.
Plus modified unit tests to cover this scenario.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 28, 2019
@vikaschoudhary16
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @abhinavdahiya

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 29, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, vikaschoudhary16

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 29, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 08cac1c into openshift:master Jun 29, 2019
@vikaschoudhary16 vikaschoudhary16 deleted the fix-remove-containers branch August 23, 2019 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants